Last words

As the election campaign for the next government officially gets underway what did we miss in the dying days of the last one?

The end of last week saw frenzied activity to clear the decks before the dissolution of parliament. Here are three things I picked out:

1) A good day to bury bad news?

That was the accusation from Labour’s Chris Ruane as he raised a point of order with the speaker about why it had taken almost five months to answer a written question he had tabled in early November about how much money was spent on social housing in each of the last 15 years. The speaker said he was ‘taken aback’ by the delay and that ministers must do better.

Here’s the reply that Ruane (finally) received from the most recent of the 22 housing ministers. Brandon Lewis gave him affordable housing expenditure for the last 15 years, arguing that ‘expenditure is a more accurate relfection of resources used to deliver affordable housing as budgets can and do fluctuate during the year.

Here are the figures he gave in graph form:

Affordable £

The answer does not say but I’m assuming these are for England only and are in 2013/14 prices. What’s interesting is that by 2013/14 the coalition had taken expenditure on affordable housing back to square one: to the level it was in 1999/00, just after the Labour government had stuck to two years of Conservative spending plans that included draconian cuts in housing investment.

The figures are not new – just look in the latest UK Housing Review – but coming from Brandon Lewis they are somewhat at odds with the standard coalition arguments he makes next:

‘The budget for the supply of new affordable housing in 2014-15 is £1,239 million. Our Affordable Homes Programme is on track to deliver 170,000 new affordable homes between 2011 and 2015, with £19.5 billion of public and private funding. Over 144,000 homes were delivered by the end of September 2014. (DCLG Affordable Housing Supply, 2013-14 (16 October 2014), table 2012, Affordable Housing starts and completions funded by the HCA and GLA (20 November 2014). We are confident that we will meet the target. 217,000 affordable housing have been delivered from April 2010 to September 2014. £38 billion of public and private investment will help ensure 275,000 new affordable homes are provided between 2015 and 2020. This means over the next parliament we will build more new affordable homes than during any equivalent period in the last 20 years.’

I wonder what possible reason there could be for delaying this answer until the dying days of the last parliament.

2) Saying farewell

The final day of parliament is also the time for valedictory speeches by MPs who are leaving the Commons.

This time they included three former housing ministers. Nothing very noteworthy about that, you might think. After all, we’ve had 22 of them since 1979 and 15 since I started writing about housing, so it all becomes a bit of a blur. However, these three deserve to be mentioned.

First up was Sir George Young. He is certainly the best Conservative housing minister in those years and arguably the best from any party. Unjustly maligned for his comment about homeless people and the opera (he was being ironic), he presided over a large increase in the budget for new social housing following the housing market crash. He also had this to say in the debate on Thursday:

‘As a former housing minister, I hope that housing will be an important issue in the campaign, as we need to build more houses than were built under either of the last two administrations if every family is to have a decent home.’

Next up was Sir John Stanley, very much at the opposite end of my league table to Sir George, but responsible for the most far-reaching change seen in that time. As he reminded the House, he was the housing minister responsible for the right to buy Housing Bill in 1979.

And finally came Nick Raynsford, another contender for best minister of the last 35 years and an influential campaigner on housing and homelessness issues before he became an MP. He became the Labour housing minister at a time when the party had taken its eye off the ball and cut funding for new social housing in line with inherited spending plans. However, I remember him for his involvement in the release of capital receipts, Decent Homes and the reinstatement of the homelessness legislation that he had campaigned for before becoming an MP.

3) Going backwards

The contrast could hardly have been stronger with the last but one housing minister, Kris Hopkins. He retained responsibility for homelessness when he was reshuffled last year and took the chance of the last day of term to issue a glowing written statement about the government’s record. He wasn’t the only DCLG minister to do this. A similarly boastful statement by his boss Eric Pickles about housing and planning delivery followed. And the decks were cleared with a series of announcements in the last few days of the government. Three Bills with a housing impact got Royal Assent on Friday. The government’s response to the consultation to the small sites exemption to zero carbon homes emerged on Friday and rules for the  affordable housing debt guarantee were published on Saturday.

Hopkins certainly sounded impressive:

‘Our investment, backed by one of the strongest legislative safety nets in the world, ensures that no family should ever be without a roof over their heads and that vulnerable people facing a housing crisis receive support.’

Or at least it did until you looked at the homelessness figures for the final quarter of 2014 published by his own department at on the same day. It’s bad enough that all the key indicators on homelessness and temporary accommodation seem to be moving in the wrong direction. Daniel Douglas reported on this for Inside Housing here.

Most telling of all is a huge increase in the number of families with children in bed and breakfast accommodation beyond the six-week legal limit. This was up 55 per cent on the previous quarter and 55 per cent on a year ago and is now back to the dire levels of 2012 and 2013 that prompted dire warnings about councils breaking the law from the then housing minister. He’s the one now running the Conservatives’ election campaign.

Originally published on Inside Edge 2, my blog for Inside Housing


One Comment on “Last words”

  1. Chris says:

    Social housing in London is being sold to developers to build luxury flats and the social tenants rehoused as far north as Birmingham or even Stoke-on-Trent, where there are less chances for jobs.

    This is happening more and more.

    Ask Class War, fielding candidates for the first time this year, and involved in social housing protests throughout London.

    The Bedroom Tax has just meant a two thirds rise in rent arrears and evictions (court costs) and then the social housing is left vacant as people too afraid to move in, for fear of the Bedroom Tax.

    I heard somewhere that Travelodges and Premier Inns were doing a roaring trade in the rehousing of social tenants trade, from councils.

    In England TUSC (Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition)
    are running 1000 councillor candidates in the 6000 councillor elections held on the same day as they are 134 MP candidates for the general election.\

    TUSC councillors already in post ALWAYS vote against austerity cut council budgets.
    They became TUSC because when doing so as Labour party members, they were sacked from the Labour party.

    You will not see these parties in the newspapers or on TV. Blogs ignore them.

    Because there is a belief they are small parties.


    Each such candidate voted into power, means less austerity MPs in power in UK parliament.

    As headed for the most severe hung parliament, only voting for small parties can ensure a secure majority government, by a group of parties reaching the 323-326 MP threshold between them.

    Never again will a single party rule the UK parliament alone.


    The poor voter coming out and voting different on 7 May, will vote out the Tories and the Lib Dems and is the sole way to lock those parties out of power, and the worse austerity still, they would bring.

    Labour alone cannot win.

    Vote Labour where sitting Labour MP in England (the biggest nation of the UK nations).

    Vote different small party of the poor of the left in Tory and Lib Dem MP areas in England.

    Vote Plaid Cymru in Wales and SNP in Scotland and Mebyon Kernow in Cornwall, and get rid of Lib Dem MPs out of the UK parliament, in particular.

    Plaid Cymru and SNP are anti austerity parties and have said they would support Labour in power in UK parliament, so even if they win Labour seats in Wales or Scotland, that is no loss to Labour being in power.

    But ensures Labour turns back to an anti austerity government.


    The poor (and non-voter which mostly are the same) now vastly outnumber all other voters.
    Ignore Russell Brand’s call not to vote. Voting has never had so much power in voting different.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s