Tax yearPosted: May 28, 2014 Filed under: Bedroom tax, Housing benefit Leave a comment
A year on and the evidence is stacking up about the impact of the bedroom tax.
Over and over again we’ve heard from ministers that tenants affected by what they call the removal of the spare room subsidy have choices: they can downsize; or they can take in a lodger; or they can get a job. And the safety net of discretionary housing payments (DHPs) is there to help the most vulnerable.
Over and over again, landlords, tenants and others have argued that it’s not so simple: smaller homes are just not available; jobs are not so easy to come by and may be impossible for many tenants with disabilities; few will want to take a stranger into their home; and DHPs are woefully inadequate to meet the scale of need.
-> Read the rest of this post on Inside Edge, my blog for Inside Housing